Showing posts with label snark. Show all posts
Showing posts with label snark. Show all posts

Thursday, December 1, 2011

A Laugh at Ann Wagner's Expense

Ann Wagner, left, Pays the Blunts for FEC Compliance*
I saw a picture over at Big Journalism with the sub-title: "Ed Martin, left, talks with Roy Blunt" and I just had to laugh. Roy Blunt's popularity among Tea Partiers and conservatives is pretty low, so Ed Martin probably doesn't want to be seen with him and certainly hasn't been seen with him recently. In short, the photo was a nice, subtle attempt to associate Ed Martin with Roy Blunt.

Of course, there are several reasons beyond Blunt's waning popularity why Ed Martin doesn't want to be seen with Missouri's newest US Senator. First, Roy Blunt has endorsed Ed's primary opponent Ann Wagner. Second, Ann Wagner chaired Blunt's 2010 Senate campaign. And third, Roy Blunt's daughter, Amy Blunt, works for the Bespoke Group and they provided "FEC Compliance" to the Ann Wagner campaign as documented above.

Given that Wagner's FEC statements have been in the news recently, I suspect that Roy Blunt was hoping to maintain a respectable distance. Who knows, maybe Roy would've been willing to be seen with Ed Martin simply to fabricate the illusion of separation between himself and Ann Wagner. Well, that's not possible now!

So, with that background, please enjoy my subtitle to the picture above once again: Ann Wagner, left, Pays the Blunts for FEC Compliance.

* I know the phrase "pays the Blunts" misses the mark, but that wording concisely conveys the irony of the situation, so I'm keeping it.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Dave Spence for Missouri Governor?

David Catanese of the POLITICO reports on possible Missouri gubernatorial candidate Dave Spence: If Kinder's out, I'm in:
St. Louis packaging executive Dave Spence told POLITICO Monday he will run for Missouri governor in 2012 if Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder passes on a campaign. 
“I know Peter Kinder, I consider him to be a friend. But if there's an opportunity, I'd like to be part of the solution," he said in an interview. "If he decides not to run, I'd do it with two feet." 
Spence, a 53-year-old executive at Alpha Packaging, met with the Republican Governors Association last week after his name circulated in GOP circles as a possible replacement candidate.
It's interesting that Spence is priming his campaign with the old-guard GOP. It's also interesting that Spence gave $1000 to far-left NY Senator Chuck Schumer (D) in 2004.

This is not how you jump start a Republican campaign. Spence leaked his political ambitions not to a media outlet with a right tilt like National Review or the Wall Street Journal, but to the left-leaning Catanese at Politico. He's donated to notorious liberal Senator Chuck Schumer. And he's seeking the help of establishment Republicans.

Dave--Mr. Spence, if you prefer--you've obviously had some difficulty getting the helium into your trial balloon, so let me offer a suggestion. Elections are won and lost at the ballot box. That means that you have to appeal to the average, grassroots voter. There are basically two hordes of average, grassroots voters: Tea Partiers or Occupants (as in Occupy Wall Street). You need a strategy to reach out to one of those groups. I suspect that you're not in what the Occupants call the 99%, so you've got to target your message for Tea Partiers.

Now, I've noticed that you've got a nice home in a good neighborhood with great yard (h/t: MOScout). That 7,700 sq. ft. golf green is pretty sweet. You should have the St. Louis Tea Party over! You'd get to know the conservative grassroots, maybe recruit some campaign volunteers, and we'd learn more about your policy preferences. We could have a cookout. That sand trap is big enough... we could spit three or four pigs and bar-b-que them in that.

Dave Spence Mansion

Saturday, September 17, 2011

President Obama Plans to Talk Like a Pirate

NYT: Obama Tax Plan Would Ask More of Millionaires:

WASHINGTON - President Obama on Monday will call for a new minimum tax rate for individuals making more than $1 million a year to ensure that they pay at least the same percentage of their earnings as middle-income taxpayers, according to administration officials.

You just can't make this stuff up. On Monday, President Obama is going to introduce a new tax on millionaires. Monday happens to be Talk Like a Pirate Day, so Obama will mark this informal holiday by introducing some more federal piracy in the form of higher taxes on high income earners. In short, he'll talk like a pirate. Sure, it's a targeted bit of piracy--targeted at those most able to pay--but the date chosen for the roll-out adds a bit of irony that could easily have been avoided for his latest populist proscription. It's yet another facepalm moment for the most inept administration in living memory.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Will #Aerotropolis Let Us Outsource Our Children to Overseas Nannies?

The Onion: Many U.S. Parents Outsourcing Child Care Overseas:

Due to rising domestic wages, many American parents are saving money by using unregulated overseas workers.

If proponents of the aerotropolis legislation pending in Jefferson City had argued that Missouri parents could outsource their child rearing responsibilities to a better qualified Chinese "Tiger Mother", legislative victory might actually be assured. However, they have instead argued that the airplanes used to bring cutting edge electronics to St. Louis would return to the People's Republic with beef cattle. The St. Louis to Shenzhen beef trade has always been, well, a red herring. As the Show Me Institute has documented, beef is ineligible for export to China, so those winged cattle-cars will have to steer clear of the Middle Kingdom.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Video: Speculating about Anthony Weiner's Future Plans

 

The money quotes run from 0:40 to 0:48. Anyone that campaigns against Weiner will blast those eight seconds over and over again. Associated Press: What Will Weiner Do Now?

It's not clear what direction Anthony Weiner's life will take now that he as resigned from Congress after a sexting scandal. New York is likely to hold a special election sometime in the next few months to pick his successor.

Media_httppajamasmedi_amcsc

I'm trying to imagine what their slogan will be... "America deserves worse" or maybe "Don't worry. We'll find a cabinet position for Jamie Gorelick!"

Friday, May 27, 2011

MiniTrue Explains Why You'll Like $5 Gasoline

MSN Money: Why you should love $5 gas:

As you pump 13 gallons into your Honda CR-V  -- American's best-selling SUV with 28 mpg on the highway and 21 in town -- it's nearly impossible to view the $50 you're spending with a positive attitude.

With the national average for regular at $3.81, it's easy to label oil executives as pond scum, but try to remain open-minded. Think of the big picture: Though that promised road trip to Disney World has gone up in carbon monoxide, high gas prices may actually have an upside. Not for you and your family personally, maybe, but perhaps for the United States as a whole.

I can only speculate, but I believe the author is vying for a position in the Obama administrations Ministry of Truth.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Enjoy the Schadenfreude: Dominique Strauss-Kahn has Resigned as Head of IMF

Media_httpwwwzerohedg_fhzbb


guardian.co.ukDominique Strauss-Kahn (DSK) resigns as head of IMF:

Dominique Strauss-Kahn has resigned as managing director of the International Monetary Fund, saying he wanted to devote "all his energy" to battle the sexual assault charges he faces in New York.

I can't say that I'm surprised. Every day there seems to be a new development including the recent revelation from the "Manhattan Madam":

Kristin Davis said she provided young women for the IMF chief in 2006, as he ran for the French Socialists' presidential nomination, and that one complained about his "aggressive" behaviour. "He was a client of my agency," she told The Daily Telegraph. "When men abuse women I'm no longer going to protect their identities". As for DSK's preference: ""He wanted an 'All-American girl', with a fresh face, from the mid-West," she said. "A girl in January 2006 complained he was rough and angry, and said she didn't want to see him again".

The French, seemingly intent on chalking up yet another loss, have been rallying around DSK leading to a rebuke from Front Page Magazine:

The onslaught has been relentless. French newspaper Le Monde and the French version of Slate Magazine have printed the woman’s name, with Le Monde adding information about the size of her breasts and the shape of her behind. A photo of the alleged victim has been revealed on Twitter, and a Facebook profile of her was linked to blogs and other social media sites before it was deleted. Bernard Henri-Lévy, who once called it “shameful to throw a 76-year-old man into prison for unlawful sex committed 32 years ago,” in reference to sexual predator Roman Polanski, is using one of the left’s favorite expressions when it comes to defending Strauss-Kahn. Henri-Lévy contends that Strauss-Kahn, more familiarly known as DSK, is a victim of sexual “McCarthyists” and “nothing in the world can justify a man being thus thrown to the dogs” which one would assume is a reference to the American justice system.

What I do know is that nothing in the world can justify a man being thus thrown to a ravenous pack of  dogs, a breed of which has neither been obedience trained nor clipped in the proper poofs.

What I know is that nothing, no suspicion whatever (for let’s remind ourselves that, as I write these lines, we are dealing only with suspicions, comingled up with a few blue-lighted Speedos), permits the entire world to revel in the spectacle, this morning, of this handcuffed figure, this magnificent avatar of Continental sophistication, this giant of Gallic philosophic chivalry, his features blurred by 30 hours of detention and questioning, his face criminally unmoisturized. But there he stood, proud and unbroken, like his dignified and noble hyphen.

What I know as well is that nothing, no earthly law, should also allow another woman, his wife, admirable in her love and courage, to be exposed to the slime of a public opinion drunk on salacious gossip and driven by who knows what obscure mob prejudice against the Gallic woman's proud spirit of laissez-affaire. I cannot even bear to consider how this indignity torments his many proud and loving and courageous mistresses. 

And what I know even more is that the Strauss-Kahn I know, who has been my friend for 20 years and who will remain my friend, bears no resemblance to this monster, this caveman, this insatiable and malevolent beast now being described nearly everywhere. Charming, seductive, yes, certainly; always quick with a flirtatious wink, obviously; and ready with a ball gag and bondage ropes, naturally. But this brutal and violent individual, this wild animal, this primate? It is absurd. In any civilized country that recognizes the natural purity of philosophical genius, the case would be dismissed on the grounds of absurdity.

This morning, I hold it against the jejune American judge who, by delivering him to the crowd of photo hounds, dared treat this man of nobility as subject to the justice of the peasant.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Dana Loesch Smacks Down Paul Begala



The video clip above is from Breitbart.tv (h/t Instapundit). Dana Loesch smacks down former Clinton apparatchik Paul Begala by pointing out that Clinton's foreign policy involved bombing a medicine factory.

Friday, March 4, 2011

Lee Fang: Lightweight Leftist Tool

John Hinderaker over at Power Line takes on the mental midget Lee Fang:
I told him that I would be delighted to give him an interview, as long as I can also interview Lee Fang. Keyes seemed taken aback, and asked what I wanted to question Fang about. I told him that I wanted to ask Fang why he never mentions Wal-Mart, and whether it is because Wal-Mart donated $500,000 to the group that owns Think Progress. I said I had lots more questions, too. Curiously enough, Keyes wasn't excited about the prospect of turning Lee Fang over to me for an interview. I told him that I would be happy to answer his questions, as soon as Think Progress makes Fang available to answer mine. The offer still stands.

What is most notable about Fang's attack on me (and others, too, in the same post) is that not once does he address the substance of anything I have written about Think Progress's attacks. If Fang thinks that something I wrote can be disproved, now would be the time to speak up.
It's been my experience that Lee Fang's attacks not only lack substance, but also diverge from reality. Last summer he attacked SharpElbows.net by remixing one of Sharp's video's so as to invert the meaning. This little dust-up with the lawyers at Power Line and Legal Insurrection should be fun to watch. Pass the popcorn, as they say!

Monday, February 21, 2011

Steve Tilley's Astroturf at Lincoln Days


Speaker of the Missouri House, Steve Tilley (R), is fertilizing some astroturf at this weekend's Lincoln Days event. Last December he offered to help cover the part of the cost of St. Louis area Young Replicans if they would agree to wear a Tilley t-shirt. In light of Tilley's recent association with the New Black Panther Party, I'm looking for photographs of attendees wearing the complete ensemble: both the Tilley t-shirt and a black beret. Extra credit will be given to anyone that gets a photo of Tilley diving behind a table to avoid beret wearing "supporters".

Sunday, January 16, 2011

George W. Bush: Your Country Needs You

Official photograph portrait of former U.S. Pr...Image via Wikipedia
Saturday brought even more insanity when one of the victims of the Tucson shooting yelled: "your dead!" at Tucson Tea Party leader Trent Humphries. Of course, the craziness began oozing out on twitter shortly after the heinous attack occurred. I suppose the progressive political vitriol will never relent.

One explanation for this is that progressive and liberal demand for deranged invective exceeds the supply of people to blame. Therefore, we must fix this critical market failure by increasing America's supply of scape goats!

As has been pointed out by Michele Malkin and Markos Krugman, George W. Bush, first elected to the Presidency in 2000, has a long history of satiating lefty derangement syndromes. It is incumbent upon him to share the blood libels and other hate currently directed at Sarah Palin. To do otherwise would be unchivalrous.

Therefore, I'm calling on President George W. Bush to run for Congress in the great state of Texas.

Whether he should run for Senate or House is really a decision for him. Kay Bailey Hutchinson has announced that she will retire from the Senate; however, it would upset the pecking order of the state GOP if he were to elbow his way to the front of the line in that race. Given that Texas will gain four seats in the House, I think it would be more politically astute for him to seek election as a Representative. This would also put him in rarefied company, since the only other person to serve in the House of Representatives after serving as President is John Quincy Adams.

Update: Thanks for the link from Gateway Pundit who has much more on Eric Fuller!

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Missouri's Democrat Leadership

Incumbent Senator Claire McCaskillImage via Wikipedia
By now everyone's heard that Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has called for Americans to take up their pitchforks, but many people may not have heard the rest of what she said:
"[The Republican Party is] worried about the people who can't decide which home to go to over the Christmas holidays. They're worried about the people who might take a jaunt to Europe for the new year. They're not worried about those people who are packing those town halls, because those folks are the middle class," she said.
Fortunately, another Missouri Democrat provides a solution for deciding which home to go to over the Christmas holidays. Susan Montee, recently lost her re-election bid for State Auditor, but in her new role as Miss Congeniality chairman of the Democratic State Party, she wrote this to her supporters:
I was momentarily stumped on Saturday when a reporter asked me what part of the state I considered home and would best represent. Having lived almost everywhere and loved them all, I could have answered almost any place. In the end, I just named the place with the biggest pile of laundry awaiting my attention.
While it may be unwise for our out-going auditor to imply that her dirty laundry is strewn across the Show Me State, I can only hope that, armed with that knowledge, local activist will do their best to air it out. If, however, you're trying to decide which of your homes to go to over Christmas, Montee recommends the one with the most laundry.

Monday, December 6, 2010

Barrett Brown Picks a Fight with The Other McCain

For the Other McCain, the world wide web is a stage and Barrett Brown is just a bit player on it:
And likewise on the Internet, nobody knows you’re a sociopathic narcissist unless, in your desperate attempts to bridge the yawning chasm of cognitive dissonance between your imagined importance and your actual irrelevance, you engage in behavior that makes your mental disorder blindingly apparent to everyone who cares to notice.
Ah, the master at work. We are not worthy.

One of the funniest things is the 13 minute video of Barret Brown imagining the Internet as a centrally controlled information Ponzi scheme, but don't watch it. Your time's more valuable than that. Somewhere around 11:20 he calls the Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft, an idiot. Of course, if righty bloggers were to implement Brown's scheme, a big name blogger like Hoft would spend the rest of his life pressing the "approve" or "decline" buttons for the millions of blog posts that filtered up to him.

It's almost as if Barret Brown doesn't know what a trackback link is or that it does the work of his Project PM for him...

Sunday, November 28, 2010

The Secrets of Diplomatic Channels

Germany's Der Spiegel created an interactive map to show the location, sensitivity (color), and quantity (circle size) of the diplomatic cables recently published on wikileaks.
The New York Times has written a good introduction to the recent WikiLeaks dump of US diplomatic communications. Their title asserts that Cables Uncloak U.S. Diplomacy; however, they also reveal the emperor's new clothes:
WASHINGTON — A cache of a quarter-million confidential American diplomatic cables, most of them from the past three years, provides an unprecedented look at backroom bargaining by embassies around the world, brutally candid views of foreign leaders and frank assessments of nuclear and terrorist threats.

...A statement from the White House on Sunday said: “We condemn in the strongest terms the unauthorized disclosure of classified documents and sensitive national security information.”

“President Obama supports responsible, accountable, and open government at home and around the world, but this reckless and dangerous action runs counter to that goal,” the statement said. “By releasing stolen and classified documents, WikiLeaks has put at risk not only the cause of human rights but also the lives and work of these individuals.”
How does hiding diplomatic communications behind a veil of secrecy support responsible, accountable, and open government? It clearly does nothing of the sort, so the administration and its enablers scurry for cover behind the cause of human rights and the lives and work of [human rights advocates]. Reuters provides the full text of another letter from the State Department which was released Saturday:
As you know, if any of the materials you intend to publish were provided by any government officials, or any intermediary without proper authorization, they were provided in violation of U.S. law and without regard for the grave consequences of this action. As long as WikiLeaks holds such material, the violation of the law is ongoing.

It is our understanding from conversations with representatives from The New York Times, The Guardian and Der Spiegel, that WikiLeaks also has provided approximately 250,000 documents to each of them for publication, furthering the illegal dissemination of classified documents.
Maybe our betters at Foggy Bottom could orchestrate trilateral talks with The New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel with particular emphasis on the pressing question: Why does the WikiLeaks founder (Julian Assange) hate us?

The Saturday letter then rehashes the same talking points noted above before devolving into preachy hypocritical sermonizing:
Publication of documents of this nature at a minimum would:

* Place at risk the lives of countless innocent individuals -- from journalists to human rights activists and bloggers to soldiers to individuals providing information to further peace and security;

* Place at risk on-going military operations, including operations to stop terrorists, traffickers in human beings and illicit arms, violent criminal enterprises and other actors that threaten global security; and,

* Place at risk on-going cooperation between countries - partners, allies and common stakeholders -- to confront common challenges from terrorism to pandemic diseases to nuclear proliferation that threaten global stability.

In your letter, you say you want -- consistent with your goal of "maximum disclosure" -- information regarding individuals who may be "at significant risk of harm" because of your actions.

Despite your stated desire to protect those lives, you have done the opposite and endangered the lives of countless individuals. You have undermined your stated objective by disseminating this material widely, without redaction, and without regard to the security and sanctity of the lives your actions endanger. We will not engage in a negotiation regarding the further release or dissemination of illegally obtained U.S. Government classified materials. If you are genuinely interested in seeking to stop the damage from your actions, you should: 1) ensure WikiLeaks ceases publishing any and all such materials; 2) ensure WikiLeaks returns any and all classified U.S. Government material in its possession; and 3) remove and destroy all records of this material from WikiLeaks' databases.
And, you, Mr. Preachy Self-Important State Department Hack, if you were genuinely interested in seeking to stop the damage from WikiLeaks, you would ask Congress to issue Letters of Marque and Reprisal so that enterprising American hackers could destroy WikiLeaks.org. You wont do that. You'll continue to negotiate. Therefore, you will continue to be embarrassed every few months.

Obviously a leak like this is damaging; however, it is also amusing. In addition to revealing the irony of our own government ("responsible, accountable, and open government") we learn via Der Spiegel (h/t Gateway Pundit), that physical abuse is not limited to the prison system in Iran: Ahmadinejad was smacked by one of his generals:
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emissaries also learn of a special "Iran observer" in the Azerbaijan capital of Baku who reports on a dispute that played out during a meeting of Iran's Supreme National Security Council. An enraged Revolutionary Guard Chief of Staff Mohammed Ali Jafari allegedly got into a heated argument with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and slapped him in the face because the generally conservative president had, surprisingly, advocated freedom of the press.

Saturday, November 13, 2010

The Cost of Federal Pay

From Instapundit:
MICKEY KAUS: Psst! Rand Paul Was Right About Federal Pay. “So you have apples in that pay basket! When I heard that Rand Paul had claimed that average federal employee’s compensation (including benefits) was more than $120,000, I thought that can’t be true. Then I read Media Matters’ lengthy response to the claim.”
I have to scold both Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) and Mickey Kaus: they fail to adequately account for the high cost of living that many Federal employees face. Many (most?) Federal employees live and work "inside the beltway." Well, it turns out that seven of the ten wealthiest counties in the United States are around our nations capital: Loudoun County, Va.; Fairfax County, Va.; Howard County, Md.; Arlington County, Va.; Montgomery County, Md.; Calvert County, Md.; and Charles County, Md.

Profligate government spending in and around DC has driven up the cost of living to the point that an honest Federal employee needs to make a small fortune just to get by. How about a little more sympathy for their lot in life!

Friday, November 12, 2010

'This is just the beginning'

Those were the words The Guardian reported hearing from someone at the student fees protest in London the other day:
Ministers and protesters acknowledged that the demonstration – by far the largest and most dramatic yet in response to the government's austerity measures – was 'just the beginning' of public anger over cuts. Police, meanwhile, were criticised for failing to anticipate the scale of the disorder.
Why not put the college curriculum on YouTube and then shutdown the universities? This would make it possible for anyone to get an education at practically no cost. Obviously, it would put a lot of faculty and staff out of work, but they could be retrained as corporate cubicle dwellers from one of the YouTube-based curricula outside of the humanities.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Dig deep, Darin

That's the subject line of an email I got today from Joe Biden and the rest of it didn't get any more encouraging for Democrats. Let's have a read:
Darin --

There's only one way to wake up the morning after an election -- with no regrets.
Ya gotta hand it to Joe—he has a way of sound vice presidential.
There's only one way to be sure that's how you wake up on November 3rd: giving everything you've got in the last five days.
Because if you don't, they're just gonna tax it from you anyway.
That's why I'm out there day after day, doing exactly what you're doing -- talking to voters.

These kinds of conversations are the most effective thing we can do in a campaign -- you know it. I know it. They're how we brought change to this country after years of Republican malarkey. They're how we won the White House.
"Malarkey." Is that how the hipsters are talkin' these day? Wow. I've been away from the scene for too long.
I know what you're doing is working because, when I'm on the road or the President's on the road, the crowds are fired up and ready to go. I'm seeing positive signs everywhere, and millions of our supporters -- including tens of thousands who have never voted before in a midterm election -- are voting early.

But we have less than a week left, and we need everyone to dig deep.
Joe's always been a master of subtlety, so if you haven't been able to penetrate his opaqueness, let me clue you in: he wants your money.
Because none of us is alone in this work, Organizing for America is pairing every grassroots donor who gives this week with another individual giving the same amount. All of us want to make an impact in these final five days, and this is a way to double it.
Hah! If you did not find yourself rolling on the floor after that paragraph, you must be either be a leftist or a humorless git. Here's the translation: "Because Moneybags Soros decided to cut us loose we have to create a meaningless incentive for our last minute pledge drive."
Please chip in $3 or more right now.

I'd never bet against this movement.
I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that several Vegas bookies have already retired after a career of betting against Joe Biden.
You're out there week after week, defying expectations. You knock on doors day after day. You make calls night after night.
Um. Joe. Um, not in Union, MO or Festus. Would you like to know where else OFA has gone dark? I don't know if you can handle it. I mean, your job is to rally the troops and that might be hard to do if you knew that the folks in St. Peters weren't pulling their weight.
Someone told me she couldn't believe that Organizing for America was reaching out to 7 million voters this week...
I couldn't either until I remembered all the voter fraud.
...and I told her that she shouldn't be surprised. You don't wait for the moment to come to you, you go out and seize it. Just Tuesday night I was in New York talking with a roomful of volunteers who were making calls and getting out the vote -- and it was a powerful thing to witness.

But we can't let up now.
That's only because you haven't yet begun to fight or something like that.
There are campaign offices out there that need to add extra phone lines because they're packed with volunteers ready to make calls. There are volunteers ready to go canvass, but they need flyers to go door to door. There are kids on college campuses working to get their classmates to vote, and they need our help, too.

I don't want to let any of them down -- not now, not when we're so close.

So I need you to join another supporter and commit to this work, together.
Really, what could be more pathetic than running a fundraiser around a matching donation when no one stepped up to provide that donation. Veep Dude, it's embarassing.
Please donate $3 or more today:

https://donate.barackobama.com/NoRegrets

Thanks for all you do,

Joe Biden
Unbelievable. They ain't got nothin' left except vice-presidential Joe-mentum to carry them on.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Laughin' at the Lizard Lady


Cross posted at www.EvictionDay2010.com

Newt V Nancy: Paychecks V Food Stamps

Newt Gingrich has pointed out that the November 2010 midterm election is about paychecks vs food stamps. Despite record spending on food stamps and unemployment benefits, job losses continue to mount. Nonetheless, on Nancy Pelosi's planet people still believe that unemployment benefits and food stamps create jobs.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Chris Powers Ruins Russ Carnahan's Recruitment Effort

Gateway Pundit reports that Russ Carnahan (D-MO) is NOT a reliable source of jobs in Missouri's Third Congressional District: "Suspect Chris Powers reportedly was upset because he did not get paid so he firebombed the Carnahan finance offices at 2 in the morning."

Let this be a warning to anyone thinking about working on Carnahan's campaign: demand higher wages and require him to prepay!

UPDATE: Welcome Gateway Punditeers! I've got other recent Russ Carnahan news and notes, too. And here's a short video of Carnahan's opponent Ed Martin.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Women's Voices Raised in Silence


Women's Voices Raised for Social Justice and other groups that sought to stop Missouri's first-in-the-nation referendum on healthcare reform, have decided not to appeal their court loss. Prop C will go forward on the August ballot. The Missouri Record's Off the Record above observes that, thankfully, raised voices can be silenced.