Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts

Monday, September 3, 2012

#MOSen: Newt Gingrich Goes to Bat for Todd Akin, Pro-Life Movement


The Daily Caller: Newt Gingrich blasts Thomas Friedman on abortion, Biden on race, Rove on Todd Akin remarks:
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich blew his stack at a range of antagonists during Sunday’s broadcast of NBC’s “Meet the Press,” lashing out at Vice President Joe Biden, GOP strategist Karl Rove, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman and Democrats in general for their party’s position on abortion.
Newt seems to understand that the pro-life movement is large enough that it should be taken seriously.

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Re-Framing Abortion: The Perpetual Political War

I hate talking about abortion. Everyone's view is carved in stone and has been for decades. Both sides get fired up at the slightest provocation and, sadly, there's never any political progress on the issue.

Even when the Whitehouse and both houses of Congress are controlled by the same party, there is practically no movement on abortion. George W. Bush had a Republican House and Senate for four years. Obama had a Democrat House and Senate for two years. Movement on the abortion issue: zippo.

There have been battles along the way--a partial-birth abortion ban that was overturned, supreme court appointments, whether government health plans should cover the morning after pill, etc. Those partisan battles are the point of this political debate, because: we've always been at war with Eastasia!

Abortion is a perpetual political war that gnaws at our polity by inflaming equal and opposite responses from Republicans and Democrats. A war where we learn to hate the "other" so we don't notice the kleptocrats looting the treasury.

Welcome to my dystopian view of the American two party system.

Because this particular debate is fraught with vitriol, I believe we need to re-frame abortion around principals that both pro-life and pro-choice advocates have in common. In arguing for or against any policy, we should refer to our shared history, tradition, and the writings of our founders and other great Americans.

America is a pluralistic society rooted in the separation of church and state. While religious arguments may sway one's view on any number of issues, they are unconvincing in this secular theater. Civility in our pluralistic society requires that we respect each other's beliefs even when we do not agree with them; therefore, appeals to religious tenants and traditions contribute to the rancor of the debate.

While America's founding was influenced by Judeo-Christian thought, those beliefs were circumscribed by our founders in the 1st Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." To find an American creed--a belief that is widely shared among Americans--I think we must limit ourselves to America's founding documents and omit references to God to have the widest secular appeal.

Our public policy discussion about abortion should be based on this phrase from the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all... are created equal..." That simple phrase establishes these tenants of our shared American creed:
  1. Our equality begins when we are "created"
  2. Our equality at creation is self-evident
  3. Collectively we agree to this truth
This framing of the policy discussion does not resolve the abortion debate because of the ambiguity surrounding the concept of "creation". Certainly, many pro-lifers will argue that creation is conception and many pro-choicers will argue that creation is not instantaneous, but rather the entire process of pregnancy culminating in birth.

I'm not trying to settle this debate, rather I would like to see thoughtful discourse on the issue. This re-framing establishes premises that all Americans can accept. This will not bring our perpetual political war over this issue to an end, but it will create a common foundation for discourse--a sort of Geneva Conventions for the war. And that, I think, will remind each side of the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree and hopefully foster some civility.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

It's Time to End the War on Prenatal Women

Heritage Action for America and pro-life groups are leading the charge to end prenatal discrimination based on gender and race. Contact your Congressman and ask them to vote “YES” on Prenatal Non-Discrimination Act:
Currently, women can receive late-term abortions for the purposes of sex selection. While U.S. law prohibits sex discrimination in employment, education, housing, health insurance coverage and athletics, there is no such protection to the unborn child. PRENDA highlights a particularly egregious and systematic form of violence against women and their unborn daughters, who are overwhelmingly the target of sex-selected abortions. 
PRENDA imposes criminal penalties on doctors who knowingly provide sex-selective abortions, and those who persuade women to seek such abortions. It also bars federal funding from any organization which does not comply with the law, and would require medical professionals to report any suspected rule violation.
Priests for Life has a little bit more about the pending legislation: Franks to Introduce Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act:
Congressman Trent Franks (AZ-2) has reintroduced this measure to bar any abortion performed because of a baby’s race or sex. Introduced in the previous Congress as HR 1822 [now HR 3541], the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act establishes penalties for abortionists who terminate babies because of skin color or gender.
It's time to pass this bill and end the war on prenatal women.

Friday, November 19, 2010

2,000+ Human Fetuses Found in Buddhist Temple

NY Daily News is reporting that more than 2,000 human fetuses were found in a Buddhist temple in Thailand:
More than 2,000 human fetuses have been found in a Buddhist temple in Thailand after police raided the house of worship this week.

Authorities had originally discovered 348 fetuses wrapped in plastic bags and newspapers on Tuesday, when disturbing odors alerted them to the Wat Phai Ngern temple in Bangkok. That number skyrocketed after a more exhaustive search of the temple's morgue uncovered hundreds more stored in vaults, The Associated Press reported.
 The temple workers who collected the fetuses from area clinics were paid about $16 per fetus. The BBC elaborates on Thai abortion law:
Abortion is illegal in Thailand unless pregnancy is the result of rape or incest or a mother's health is at risk.

Police say they have begun raiding some of the 4,000 clinics in Bangkok they suspect are used to perform illegal abortions.

Friday, October 8, 2010

Russ Carnahan is Vulnerable

Ooops! The black baby butchers tipped their hand: NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC Sends $100,000 to Candidates in Competitive House Races:
The PAC‘s contributions include $5,000 each to the general-election campaigns of the following pro-choice incumbents: Reps. Russ Carnahan in Missouri’s 3rd District; Phil Hare in Illinois’ 17th District...
They list several other incumbents, but I think Adam "Jackpot Brother" Sharp would be proud that his top two targets are listed first among the Congressional candidates that NARAL believes to be vulnerable. Nice work, Sharp!

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Abortion Funding Still in Senate Bill

Senator Harry Reid's (D-NV) government-run health plan still requires a monthly abortion fee: "Under Reid’s 'manager’s amendment,' there is no prohibition on abortion coverage in federally subsidized plans participating in the Exchange." Of course there's still money for abortions, the government gives money to abortion providers so that abortion providers will give money to Democrat campaigns. It's the lather, rinse, repeat cycle of Democrat public choice theory and when the final history of our era is written, it will show that many, many of those Democrat seats in Congress were bought with the blood of black babies (while African-Americans make up about 13% of the population they account for about 36% of abortions). That's why the gravy train to Planned Parenthood has to continue.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Population Control

The Cybercast News Service has a startling quote from Justice Ginsberg:
Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.
The US Census Bureau implies that, in 2005, blacks comprised about 13.4% of the total population. The J. Kaiser Family Foundation tells me 35.5% of the abortions performed in 2005 were for blacks. Justice Ginsberg, two words: Never Again (WARNING: graphic).

Previously:

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Finding Abortion's Common Ground

Dana Loesch has a new post at blogher.com On Notre Dame and Life. While I agree with Dana throughout the piece, I think she let's her outrage get the better of her on the abortion debate. Here's part of what she wrote:
When President Obama said that we must find common ground I cringed a bit. This isn't Cap and Trade, it isn't an economic principle, it's not an opinion that either side holds; to find common ground one must back off a fundamental principle of what they believe.“The problem here is that we’re trivializing abortion,” said Rev. Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life. It doesn't just trivialize abortion, it also trivializes the beliefs of either side to assume that they can just lay down fundamental beliefs for the sake of false political harmony.
I agree with the president that we should work together to find common ground on this issue. Perhaps I have a unique view, but I do not believe that we need to cede any ground as we work together with President Obama.

My first suggestion is that we strive for gender equity in abortion. This can be achieved by introducing legislation that makes gender selective abortions illegal. So, which is it Mr. President? Does a pregnant woman have the right to abort her boy babes or do you stand for gender equity?

Second, over 35% of abortions in the US are performed for black mothers while African Americans compose only about 13% of the population. Clearly, abortion dispropotionately effects the African American community. At the local and state level, zoning laws could be used to limit the number of abortion facilities in predominately black neighborhoods. While I do not support racial quotas, that shouldn't stop President Obama from voicing his support for legislation that places firm racial quotas on abortion. Surely, he wants to do whatever he can to end the Black Genocide (warning: some photos on that site are graphic).

As conservatives settle into their diminished role they need to articulate persuasive arguments that further their agenda. This means smaller, hopefully more achievable, goals. By chipping away at abortion with focused attacks on its more offensive aspects, we broaden our appeal. Confronting the appalling racial statistics of abortion will demonstrate leadership on a little known "social justice" issue. That in turn will burnish our brand.

President Obama has made a couple of hollow offers (yes, I doubt the sincerity of his search for "common ground" and his promise to sit down with Tea Partiers); however, by engaging those offers we are able to descern his true motives. If a bill is introduced in Congress to reduce the number of minority abortions, he's going to be asked about it. Michelle will also be asked. Maybe it will even pass.