Sunday, January 8, 2012

Rolling out Dave Spence for Governor

Dave Spence

David Spence introducing himself to Missouri Republicans:
ST. LOUIS • Months after he first discussed the goal of seeking the Republican nomination for governor, St. Louis businessman Dave Spence remains a virtual unknown to most party activists across Missouri.
Thus begins Jake Wagman's coverage of Dave Spence in the Post Dispatch this past Saturday. Spence is a political newcomer, so I expect him to make some mistakes along the way. I think he could have announced his candidacy better, but I also appreciate the fact that he was willing to engage a grassroots organization like the St. Louis Tea Party. The photo above was from the Tea Party's Christmas Party last December. Since my initial criticism was about the fact that he didn't engage grassroots for his announcement, I see his willingness to meet with Tea Partiers in December as a course correction. Hopefully, he remains on his new heading.

The Post Dispatch provides a good introduction to Spence, so read the whole thing. Below, I will focus on what I think Spence's strategy should be to earn grassroots support.

In addition to Spence, Bill Randles has announced that he's running for governor. Randles has already begun to build a base of grassroots conservative support; however, Randles hasn't been able to raise much money. This race looks to be one between Randles grassroots boots on the ground and Spence's TV and radio driven air war. Ultimately, one of these two men will face Gov. Jay Nixon next November. Nixon raised over $17M in his 2008 campaign and has a reputation as a moderate Democrat. He will be hard to beat.

Because of his money advantage, I believe that Spence will win the primary unless Randles rapidly raises a lot more money. Basically, Spence will be able to buy the name id that Randles can't afford and that's what will win the primary for him. However, Spence has to be careful not to alienate Randles's supporters because Spence needs them to join him in the Fall for the fight against Nixon.

To do that, Spence needs to be accessible. He could host get togethers around the state like Ed Martin's "Ask Ed Anything" events. Speaking engagements will also help. He has to make a point of engaging the people who've come to see him. Often those people have come because they have a question for the candidate, so he needs to allow time at the end of those speeches to mingle.

I think there need to be several debates between Spence and Randles and they need to be held around the state so voters have an opportunity to see these candidates. At least a couple of debates should occur during the legislative session so that these men can comment on the Republican controlled General Assembly and their own legislative priorities. Spence should expect to be attacked by Randles (which isn't to say that Randles will attack him, merely that Spence should be prepared), but Spence needs to be gracious in his self-defense if he wants Randles supporters to help him in the Fall.

Ultimately, I would like to see Jay Nixon defeated in November. If Spence plays his cards right during the primary he could gain additional grassroots support in the Fall. The primary fight in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District between Ed Martin and Ann Wagner is also shaping up to be one between Ed's ground game and Ann's air campaign; however, that district is solidly conservative, so many grassroots activists will be looking for something else to do once the primary is over. Spence (and Randles) should build bridges to those activists during the primary so they can leverage those grassroots against Nixon in the Fall.

Ann Wagner Opens Campaign Office


Ann Wagner is running against Tea Party conservative Ed Martin in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District. She begins speaking in the video above at the one minute mark.

Friday, January 6, 2012

Comparing the Employment-Population Ratio to the Unemployment Rate

Employment-Population Ratio versus the Unemployment Rate
Earlier today the Bureau of Labor Statistics released their monthly Employment Situation Summary for December of 2011. The top line numbers are 200k new jobs and the unemployment rate of 8.5%. Those are good, but not great numbers.

What's more interesting to me is that while the Unemployment Rate is continuing to trend downward, the Employment-Population Ratio is holding steady (the BLS will break that link in a month):
The civilian labor force participation rate (64.0 percent) and the employment- population ratio (58.5 percent) were both unchanged over the month. (See table A-1.)
How can the unemployment rate decline while the ratio of employed people to the total population remains constant? This has to do with the formula used to calculate the unemployment rate. That rate is figured based on the number of people who are working versus the number of people looking for work. Those are the people who are considered employed or looking for work. But someone who's been looking for work for a long enough time is no longer considered "in the labor force." They are re-categorized as "marginally attached to the labor force" and, if their search for employment is unsuccessful for a long enough period, they will be re-categorized again as "discouraged workers."

There were 2.5M people listed as marginally attached to the labor force. Of those, 945k were discouraged workers.

Analyzing Iowa

DSC00602
The Weekly Standard: Morning Jay: What Iowa Tells Us About the State of the Race:
Mitt Romney received eight more votes in the Iowa caucuses than Rick Santorum. The media is spinning this as if it matters who actually receives more votes. It really doesn't. This is a battle for delegates -- a long one. It's not a winner take all election to serve as Iowa governor, senator, or whatever. Thus, it's fair to conclude that both Romney and Santorum won; Bachmann, Gingrich, and Perry lost; and Paul remains a libertarian insurgent who cannot win the GOP nomination because he is too far out of step with the modern GOP.
As always, Jay Cost provides an excellent review of the numbers. He concludes: "[Romney's] advantage is due primarily to the weakness of his opposition." It certainly looks that way.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Satire: Emmis Communications and Enterprise Rent a Car Exchange Gifts

Ann Wagner (left) presents John (right) and wife Lori Beck (center) with the flag from the Enterprise Corporate Headquarters
St. Louis -- In a symbolic gesture to mark the winter holidays, Ann Wagner, a Republican candidate in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District, presented John and Lori Beck with the flag that used to fly over Enterprise Rent a Car's corporate headquarters. John Beck, Senior Vice President of Emmis Communications, and his wife Lori returned the favor by holding a fundraiser at their home for undecided supporters of Wagner's Congressional campaign. John Beck emphasized that they held the fundraiser to show their impartiality in the hotly contested 2nd Congressional District. Beck also noted that his on-air staff at 97.1FM Talk would continue to emphasize that they are undecided in the race between Ann Wagner and Tea Party conservative Ed Martin. Radio personalities Jamie Allman and Dana Loesch reaffirmed their indifference to Ann Wagner while also demonstrating their commitment to neutrality in Missouri's 2nd Congressional District.

Claire's Eminent Domain

Car_01
Mass Appeal News: KC Race track draws ire:
Loud noise or racing history? That’s the dilemma facing Kansas City public officials and supporters of the Kansas City International Raceway, a popular drag racing strip on the brink on demolition. On Wednesday (Nov 2), the Planning and Zoning Committee gave clearance to the park board to purchase the race track, which consists of 93 acres along Noland Road near 350 Highway in the southeast part of Kansas City.
...
“It has been a long time coming,” said 5th District at-large Councilwoman Cindy Circo. “It was a priority, and there was money available for it.”
...
On May 26, a condemnation notice was sent out by Capital Projects Development to NP3 Racing Incorporated, the rightful owner of KCIR.
Word on the street claims NP3 and other property owners in the vicinity were given ultimatums to either sell their lots or risk condemnation.
...
Some believe Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill is one of the parties primarily responsible for what many believe is a forced sale. She reportedly owns several acres in the immediate area that she has been trying to sell for years. The aforementioned Circo is a known fundraiser for McCaskill. See the correlation?
Like McCaskill (pictured left), Christine Kemper of the Kansas City Sports Commission owns a property near the track. She is also a long-time adversary of KCIR. And, although Kemper has been successful in levying fees and operational restrictions against the drag racing strip, she couldn’t muster enough momentum to shut the track down.

Let me start out by saying that the "sale" of the track is not a decision that the owners want to make. They are not sell-outs, nor are they willingly abandoning the racing community. They are as deeply tied to racing, if not more, than anyone here.

In a nutshell, this was a political move. It may be one person, it may be a combination of people, but there are only 3 major players who have the kind of clout around KC to force the sale of the track.

1. Claire McCaskill. She owns approximately 27 acres (I believe) in the immediate vicinity of the track. My understanding is that she has been unable to market or sell her property for a significant profit because of the proximity of her property to the race track. That might make a good motive to lean on the city to force the track out of operation. And you can't forget councilwoman Circo...who also happens to be a fundraiser for Claire McCaskill. Interesting how that works out, isn't it?

...

Next, while what the city may try to claim is that this is a voluntary sale, nothing could be further from the truth. The city had been trying to buy the track for a while, but could never come up with any money. So the track entered into negotiations with another buyer (who would actually keep the track there, but would result in an infusion of cash for the track). After finding out that the current owners had found a buyer that would keep the track where it is, the city sent a letter threatening the condemnation of the land. Guess what that did to the sale of the property.

Tony's Kansas City (while this link is fine, some Tony's KC posts are NSFW) does a good job deconstructing the ordinance fact sheet in these three docs:
Cindyone
 
Cindytwo
 
Cindythree
Did Claire McCaskill pull Cindy Circo's strings for the eminent domain threat? Will McCaskill profit from putting a small business, the Kansas City International Raceway, out of business?

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Re-examining a Laugh at Ann Wagner's Expense

Early last December I had a little fun with an Ann Wagner expense for "FEC Compliance". I wrote that post in response to a post by Jim Hoft that I saw in BigJournalism. Hoft's original post went up at Gateway Pundit; however, when it was picked up by BigJournalism, a photo of Ed Martin and Roy Blunt was added.
Photographic Deception
That picture was not in Jim Hoft’s original piece. Clearly, the photo is meant to tie Ed Martin to the Establishment. Who made and approved the decision to add the picture to the Big Journalism story, when it wasn’t included at Gateway Pundit?

Here's another picture. This one is from StlToday.com. It's a pretty clear refutation of the Big Journalism picture.
Roy Blunt, US Senate, Political Team: Andy Blunt, Ann Wagner, and Roy Blunt
Roy Blunt, US Senate, Political Team: Andy Blunt, Ann Wagner, and Roy Blunt
Look closely at those black jackets. They're emblazoned with: "Roy Blunt, US Senate, political team." During Roy Blunt's 2010 US Senate campaign, Ann Wagner was Roy Blunt’s campaign chair. (Full disclosure: I supported Chuck Purgason). I've already pointed out how ridiculous the Ed and Roy photo was, but there’s more.

Dana Loesch, the Editor and Chief of BigJournalism, has a habit sending “inside baseball” tweets. It’s a pattern that allows her to take a swipe at someone, while giving her deniability when pressed as to who she was talking about. Here's an example:
Tired of hearing that Candidate B “is at war with Missouri Establishment.”  give me a break.  They ARE MISSOURI ESTABLISHMENT
Dana is talking about Ed Martin. She’s asserting that Ed is part of the establishment, and thus can’t be the Tea Party candidate. That tweet was sent shortly after Bill Hennessy wrote a piece praising Ed Martin. That was the first of many tweets and comments she’s made since Ann Wagner entered the race in a clear pattern of attacking Ed where he is strongest – at the grassroots.

So let’s compare the records of Ed Martin and Ann Wagner.

Ed Martin was tapped to be Chief of Staff for Matt Blunt in 2006. He had been effective at the St Louis Board of Elections, and was considered an outsider pick at the time. Also, he knows Missouri politicians.  And he ran for Congress against Russ Carnahan and almost won. That’s about as far as you get in calling him establishment.

Ann Wagner has been in Missouri Republican politics for 15 years. Her husband was on the board fo the RCGA, the Hawthorn Group, the Missouri Tax Commission, and he’s been a registered lobbyist for years. The Wagners hang out with Democrat St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley at his birthday party. They host fundraisers for Dick Lugar. Ray helped lead the 911 tax increase for St Louis County. They bundle contributions, doing so well that Ann got picked as the Ambassador to Luxembourg, one of the wealthiest countries in Europe per capita, with opulent parties and a lot of good times. Ann Wagner is so establishment, she ran for RNC chair.

Now she claims she’s never been a candidate before, but as former head of Missouri's Republican Party and with a failed bid for RNC chair, the truth is a little more complicated. Ann Wagner has never been a candidate for public office before. It’s telling that her first attempt was RNC Chair, an attempt to run the national GOP for Washington D.C. Republicans. Failing that, her second choice was Missouri Senate. She clearly felt her Establishment backing was enough to be beat Sarah Steelman and Ed Martin in a statewide race. But, when Todd Akin entered that race, Ann decided to run for his open Congressional seat instead. Does anyone else get the sense she’s just casting around for something to do?

How has Ann approached her race? She’s gone out to her friends and fundraising network and asked for endorsements. She’s hung out at fancy fundraisers. She’s had Enterprise buy her access to parties. She’s hired Jeff Roe and John Hancock two of Missouri's top shelf GOP hacks consultants. She’s called out of state Republicans and asked them to endorse her. And she’s getting them (if you count paying for chartered planes and giving to candidate committees endorsements).

If Ann Wagner isn’t the Missouri Establishment, then why did her donors give 63% of the money for Amendment 2, the 2006 pro-cloning ballot initiative? If she isn’t establishment, why is the Missouri Republican Party letting her hijack a Chris Christie visit? If she’s not establishment, why has her strategy been to tell people Ed Martin would run for Lieutenant Governor, instead of campaigning in the 2nd District?  The Establishment tells candidates when and where to run. The Tea Party welcomes all candidates to fight it out with ideas and campaigns.

Ann Wagner is the essence of Establishment, and has been at least since her 1996 work on Bob Dole's presidential campaign when she haughtily derided fellow Republicans by calling them "stamp-licking peons". My question is: what is Dana Loesch doing inserting herself into Missouri primaries? For someone who swears up and down she isn’t involved, Dana sure spends a lot of time throwing stones at Ed Martin. If Dana wants to be neutral, she needs to be neutral.  If she wants to play the game of supporting Ann by attacking Ed, then she needs to answer some tough questions and not hide behind anonymous accusations.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Casualties of the Iowa Caucus?

DSC00557
Michele Bachmann
It looks like the fifth and sixth place finishers in the Hawkeye Caucii may be getting out of the presidential race. Bachmann I understand because she's never really gained traction; however, I thought that Perry's plan was always to focus on winning South Carolina. With Santorum winning Iowa, South Carolina's social conservatives will have a reasonable alternative to Perry.
The Associated Press: Bachmann tells supporters she's staying in race:
Shortly before Bachmann spoke, her campaign manager suggested she might leave the race. Asked if he could say with certainty whether she would go forward with her candidacy, Bachmann campaign manager Keith Nahigian told The Associated Press in a telephone interview, "I don't know yet."
He added, "It's hard to tell, but everything is planned."
But shortly thereafter he said she was going "full steam" ahead.
After a disappointing fifth-place finish in Tuesday's Iowa caucuses, Texas Governor Rick Perry said he is going home to Texas to assess "whether there is a path forward for myself in this race."

Video: Andrea Mitchell: "Iowa Doesn't Represent the Rest of the Country"


RealClearPolitics: Andrea Mitchell: Iowa Is "Too White, Too Evangelical, Too Rural":
NBC's Andrea Mitchell gives her take on the state of Iowa while covering the upcoming caucus. Mitchell makes her feelings about the Midwestern state to the viewers, opining that "the rap" on Iowa is that it is too white. 
"The rap on Iowa: It doesn't represent the rest of the country, too white, too evangelical, too rural. Still here, politics are personal," Mitchell said on Sunday's broadcast on NBC's "Nightly News.
That's the sort of condescending elitism that I've come to expect from the wife of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Notably, Ron Paul continues to do well in the most recent polls.

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Rick Santorum has Momentum

PJ Media: Santorum Appears to Have Momentum Going into Tuesday Night:

Signs of Santorum’s emergence include endorsements by some leading evangelicals, larger crowds, and the first negative ads or criticism directed against him by opponents, most notably from Rick Perry, who is competing with Santorum for some of the same voters.

Who knows how things will turn out in Iowa. Clearly, the wheels have come off Michele Bachmann's campaign and internal fighting has distracted Perry's team, so it's good to see someone capitalize on those disaffected voters.